Earl Henry De Bohun HEREFORD, II
(Abt 1176-1220)
Maud De Mandeville FITZ GEOFFREY
(Abt 1177-1236)
Raoul De LUSIGNAN
(Abt 1164-1219)
Alice
(Abt 1180-)
Earl Humphrey De Bohun HEREFORD, V
(Abt 1202-1275)
Maud De LUSIGNAN
(Abt 1204-)
Earl Humphrey De Bohun HEREFORD, VI
(Abt 1220-1265)

 

Family Links

Spouses/Children:
1. Eleanor De BRAOSE

2. Joane QUINCY

Earl Humphrey De Bohun HEREFORD, VI 1

  • Born: Abt 1220, Kimboton, , England
  • Christened: Abt 1228, Pleshey, Essex, England
  • Married (1): 1246, , Essex, England
  • Died: 27 Oct 1265

   Another name for Humphrey was HEREFORD 3rd Earl.

   Ancestral File Number: 8XJQ-NB. User ID: 4727432.

   General Notes:

Humphrey Bohun of BRECON, 3rd Earl of HEREFORD, Signer of Provisions of Oxford, 1st English Constitution 11 Jun 1258.

BOOKS
Political History of England 1216-1377, Vol III, T F Tout, AMS Press, 1905, p100: "...On June 11 [1258] the magnates once more assembled, this time at Oxford. A petition of twenty-nine articles was presented, in which the abuses of the [Henry III] administration were laid bare in detail. A commission of twenty-four was appointed who were to redress the grievances of the nation, and to draw up a new scheme of government. According to the compact Henry himself selected half this body...
"...In strong contrast to these creatures of court favour were the twelve nominees of the barons. The only ecclesiastic was Walter of Cantilupe, Bishop of Worcester, and the only alien was Earl Simon of Leicester. With him were three other earls Richard of Clare, Earl of Gloucester, Roger Bigod, earl marshal and Earl of Norfolk, and Humphrey Bohun, Earl of Hereford. Those of Baronal rank were Roger Mortimer, the strongest of the marchers, Hugh Bigod, the brother of the earl marshal, John Fitz Geoffrey, Richard Grey, William Bardolf, Peter Montfort, and Hugh Despenser.
"...The twenty-four drewup a plan of reform which left little to be desired in thoroughness. The Provisions of Oxford, as the new constitution was styled, were speedily laid before the barons and adopted...For the first time in our history the king was forced to stand aside from the discharge of his undoubted functions, and suffer them to be exercised by a committee of magnates. The conception of limited monarchy, which had been foreshadowed in the early struggles of Henry's long reign, was triumphantly vindicated, and, after weary years of waiting, the baronial victors demanded more than had ever been suggested by the most free interpretation of the Great Charter..."

A History of The Plantagenets, Vol II, The Magnificent Century, Thomas B Costain, 1951, Doubleday & Co
p278: "Simon de Montfort made his dispositions for battle. His army was small, numbering perhaps a little in excess of four thousand men. The center was given to the command of Gilbert of Gloucester with two veteran campaigners to assist him, Williamof Montchesni and John Fitzjohn. The right wing was entrusted to Simon's two sons, Henry and Guy, assisted by John de Burgh and Humphrey de Bohun..."

Political History of England 1216-1377, Vol III, T F Tout, AMS Press, 1905,
p98: "...OnApril 2, [1258] the chief men of Church and State gathered together at London. For more than a month the stormy debates went on. The king's demands were contemptuously waved aside. His exceptional misdeeds, it was declared, were to be met byexceptional measures...An opposition party formed itself under the Earls of Gloucester, Leicester, Hereford, and Norfolk...In parliament all that Henry could get was a promise to adjourn the question of supply until a commission had drafted a programme of reform. On May 2 Henry and his son Edward announced their acceptance of this proposal; parliament was forthwith prorogued, and the barons set to work to mature their scheme.
p99: "...One June 11 [1258] the magnates once more assembled, this time at Oxford. A summons to fight the Welsh gave them an excuse to appear attended with their followers in arms. The royalist partisans nicknamed the gathering the Mad Parliament, but its proceedings were singularly business-like. A petition tion of twenty-nine articles was presented, in which the abuses of the [Henry III] administration were laid bare in detail. A commission of twenty-four was appointed who were to redress the grievances of the nation, and to draw upa new scheme of government. According to the compact Henry himself selected half this body. It was significant of the falling away of the mass of the ruling families from the monarchy, that six of Henry's twelve commissioners were churchmen, four were aliens, three were his brothers, one his brother-in-law, one his nephew, one his wife's uncle...
"...In strong contrast to these creatures of court favour were the twelve nominees of the barons. The only ecclesiastic was Walter ofCantilupe, Bishop of Worcester, and the only alien was Earl Simon of Leicester. With him were three other earls Richard of Clare, Earl of Gloucester, Roger Bigod, earl marshal and Earl of Norfolk, and Humphrey Bohun, Earl of Hereford. Those of Baronal rank were Roger Mortimer, the stronest of the marchers, Hugh Bigod, the brother of the earl marshal, John FitzGeoffrey, Richard Grey, William Bardolf, Peter Montfort, and Hugh Despenser.
"...The twenty-four drew up a plan of reformwhich left little to be desired in thoroughness. The Provisions of Oxford, as the new constitution was styled, were speedily laid before the barons and adopted...For the first time in our history the king was forced to stand aside from the discharge of his undoubted functions, and suffer them to be exercised by a committee of magnates. The conception of limited monarchy, which had been foreshadowed in the early struggles of Henry's long reign, was triumphantly vindicated, and, afterweary years of waiting, the baronial victors demanded more than had ever been suggested by the most free interpretation of the Great Charter..."
p103: "...Immediately on the flight of the Lusignans the Council of Fifteen was chosen aftera fashion which seemed to give the king's friends an equal voice with the champions of the aristocracy. Four electors appointed it, and of these two were the nominees of the baronial section, and two of the royalist section of the original twenty-four. The result of their work showed that there was only one party left...While only three of the king's twelve had places on the permanent council, no less that nine of the fifteen were chosen from the baronial twelve. It was useless for Archbishop Boniface, John Mansel, and the Earl of Warwick to stand up against the Bishop of Worcester, the Earls of Leicester, Norfolk, Hereford, and Gloucester, against John FitzGeoffrey, Peter Montfort, Richard Grey, and Roger Mortimer.
p110: "...The death of Richard of Gloucester during 1262 increased Mont- fort's power. His son, the young Earl Gilbert, was Simon's devoted disciple, but he was still a minor and the custody of his lands was handed over to the Earl of Hereford..."
p111: "...A new royalist party was growing up with a wider policy and greater efficiency than the old coterie of courtiers and aliens. Of this new party Edward was the soul. He had dissociated himself form Earl Simon, but he carried into his father's camp something of simon's breadth of vision and force of will. He set to work to win over individually the remnant that adhered to Leicester. What persuasion and policy could not effect was accomplished by bribes and promises. Edward won over the Earl of Hereford, whose importance was doubled by his custody of the Gloucester lands, the ex-justicar Roger Bigod, and above all Roger Mortimer..."
p115: "...The poverty of Montfort's host in historic families attested the complete disintegration of the party since 1263. Its strength lay in the young enthusiasts, who were still dominated by the strong personality and generous ideals of Leicester, such as the Earl of Gloucester, or Humphrey Bohun of Brecon, whose father, the Earl of Hereford, was fighting on the king's side..."

INTERNET
Draper Gedcom
http://www.my-ged.com/db/page/draper/05722
Born Abt 1220 Kimboton.

ANCESTRAL FILE
Ancestral File Ver 4.10 8XJQ-NB Born Abt 1220 Mar Wales? England? Died 27 Oct 1265, Ver 4.19 Born Hereford Herefordshire England.

INTERNATIONAL GENEALOGICAL INDEX
IGI Birth 7222293-99-822001 Humphrey DE BOHUN Mother Maud D'EU Father Humphrey DE BOHUN 1228 Pleshey Essex England.

IGI Marriage 7221330-36-820474 Humphrey DE BOHUN Spouse Eleanore DE BRAOSE 1246 Essex England.

   Marriage Information:

Humphrey married Eleanor De BRAOSE, daughter of William De BRAOSE and Eva MARSHAL, in 1246 in , Essex, England. (Eleanor De BRAOSE was born about 1226-1230 in Brecon, Breconshire, Wales, died before 1246 in Inn, Llanthony, Gloucestershire, England and was buried in Llanthony, Gloucestershire, England.)

   Marriage Information:

Humphrey also married Joane QUINCY.

Sources


1 Ancestral File Ver 4.19, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Copyright (c) 1987, June 1998, data as of 5 January 1998.


Home | Table of Contents | Surnames | Name List

This Web Site was Created 27 Mar 2002 with Legacy 4.0 from Millennia